Harry Potter: The Prisoner of Azkaban: Two words, NEW DIRECTOR. This idiot they hired, I realize had a different 'vision', but to take a 'set', that has been established for two movies and FIVE BOOKS, and just change shit around? And then change the ENDING? Was this necessary? No. Next!
28 Days Later: Sorry, where is that barf bag again? Bad. Interesting premise (rage as a virus?), but I really think they screwed it up in the very beginning. They should have gone with the 'alternate ending' that is on the dvd in storyboards. Most of that made more sense.
Secretary: One of my now all time favorites. Not necessarily a good movie, but for me...yes. They did a good job with the 'subject matter' and put it in a positive light. I *must* buy a copy.
Pitch Black and Chronicles of Riddick: Again, neither are what I would consider good movies, per se, but I liked them both.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
ADDITIONS!
Date: 2004-07-28 11:33 am (UTC)Harry Potter: The Prisoner of Azkaban: Two words, NEW DIRECTOR. This idiot they hired, I realize had a different 'vision', but to take a 'set', that has been established for two movies and FIVE BOOKS, and just change shit around? And then change the ENDING? Was this necessary? No. Next!
28 Days Later: Sorry, where is that barf bag again? Bad. Interesting premise (rage as a virus?), but I really think they screwed it up in the very beginning. They should have gone with the 'alternate ending' that is on the dvd in storyboards. Most of that made more sense.
Secretary: One of my now all time favorites. Not necessarily a good movie, but for me...yes. They did a good job with the 'subject matter' and put it in a positive light. I *must* buy a copy.
Pitch Black and Chronicles of Riddick: Again, neither are what I would consider good movies, per se, but I liked them both.