fiat_knox: silhouette of myself taken at sunrise (Default)
[personal profile] fiat_knox
Just thought I'd drop you this link before scuttling back into the warm tonight ...

Transsexual Gene Link Identified


Discuss. :)

(no subject)

Date: 2008-10-29 10:28 am (UTC)
cdave: (Default)
From: [personal profile] cdave
I don't have time to read this link, and formulate an opinion on it, right now. Sorry.

What're your thoughts?

Good / Bad ...

Date: 2008-10-29 12:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fiat-knox.livejournal.com
Good: Ignorant people might no longer be able to rant about transsexualism being a mere lifestyle choice or "perversion" of what they define as "normal." Based on the above news article, there is now likely to be a genetic cause for transsexuals' gender dysmorphia after all.

Also, this could be a fascinating topic for study. Could we humans have acquired this from a common evolutionary ancestor? Was this an ancient survival mechanism from some predecessor species, such that when a population grew scarce, males could turn into females and vice versa? Could this be a link to our evolutionary past? The scientist in me would dearly love to know.

Very Good: Increases the grounds for gender reassignments for people on the grounds of compassion. Candidates for gender reassignment surgery could request a DNA test to ascertain the presence of this gene in their genetic makeup as part of their attempts to assert their claim for the surgery.

Not So Good: Medical insurance companies could secure this data and use it as an excuse for not paying any medical bills for gender reassignment surgeries. But that's not related to this finding. That's probably the usual greed and bigotry among the medical insurance fraternity.

Vile: There'll always be some throwback redneck who won't believe a bloody word of the above anyway,and will still think that trannies are the Devil's footsoldiers, or some such stupidity.

Re: Good / Bad ...

Date: 2008-10-29 12:53 pm (UTC)
cdave: (Default)
From: [personal profile] cdave
Interesting. I see a corollary to your Very Good, which is what happens to thos without the gene, who want the surgery?

Re: Good / Bad ...

Date: 2008-10-29 01:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fiat-knox.livejournal.com
They would have to fight even harder than they do now to overcome the same barriers that plague the whole set of candidates for gender reassignment.

Sadly, I can now see a scenario where this discovery may well lead to a situation where the subset of those candidates who have the gene markers will find the road to surgery made a little easier, at the expense of a thickening of the glass wall for those belonging to the remainder of the set of candidates who do not.

So, overall, that is a minus.

Shit.

March 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
234 5678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 1st, 2025 07:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios